When Foreigners Infringe Patents: An Empirical Look at the Involvement of Foreign Defendants in Patent Litigation in the U.S
نویسنده
چکیده
This article presents results from a multiple-year project concerned with the involvement of foreign (non-U.S.) entities in U.S. patent litigation. A comparison of data from 2004 and 2009 that cover 5,407 patent cases filed in U.S. federal district courts in those two years evidences an increase in the number of cases involving foreign defendants, and thus an increasing potential for cross-border enforcement problems. With this basic finding, the research supports the proposition advanced by a number of intellectual property scholars in the U.S. and abroad that rules need to be established to facilitate a smooth process for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in intellectual property cases. The research fills a significant gap in the existing literature, which has relied so far on only isolated individual cases to illustrate cross-border enforcement problems; comprehensive empirical evidence has not existed to show a growing need for improved rules for recognition and enforcement. In addition to providing missing evidence, this article uses data concerning the involvement of foreign defendants to reveal remarkable facts about the changing landscape of patent litigation in the U.S. † Associate Professor of Law, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. The author would like to thank Professor Mark Lemley and Professor Paul Goldstein of Stanford Law School, Professor Mary LaFrance of William S. Boyd School of Law, Professor Brenda Simon of Thomas Jefferson School of Law, and Gary A. Trimble for their comments and support. She appreciates the assistance provided to her by Joshua Walker and the staff of the Stanford IP Litigation Clearinghouse, later Lex Machina, and by David McClure of the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. Additional thanks go to the participants at the IP Scholars Conferences in 2009 and 2010. The underlying research represents a multiple-year project that was funded partially by a summer research stipend from the William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and by a fellowship grant from the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the Grantee. For additional findings of the research see MARKETA TRIMBLE, GLOBAL PATENTS: LIMITS OF TRANSNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT (forthcoming 2012). 09 TRIMBLE 5/17/2011 12:49:28 AM 500 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J. [Vol. 27
منابع مشابه
Foreigners in U.S. Patent Litigation: An Empirical Study of Patent Cases Filed in Nine U.S. Federal District Courts in 2004, 2009, and 2012
One of the greatest challenges facing patent holders is the enforcement of their rights against foreign (non-US) infringers. Jurisdictional rules can prevent patent holders from filing patent infringement suits where they have the greatest likelihood of success in enforcement, such as where the infringer is located, has its seat, or holds its assets. Instead, patent holders must file lawsuits i...
متن کاملThe Patent Litigation Explosion
This paper provides the first look at patent litigation hazards for public firms during the 80s and 90s. Consistent with our model, litigation is more likely when prospective defendants spend more on R&D, when prospective plaintiffs acquire more patents and when firms are larger and technologically close. Public firms face dramatically increased hazards of litigation as plaintiffs and even more...
متن کاملAdvantages Of Inter Partes Review In Hatch-Waxman Cases
Law360, New York (November 15, 2012, 1:11 PM ET) -Signed into law by President Obama on Sept. 16, 2011, the America Invents Act represents the most sweeping changes to U.S. patent law in over 60 years. Among its many provisions, the AIA created a new administrative patent challenge proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office: inter partes review.[1] The new IPR replaces inter pa...
متن کاملCharacteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition
The cost of engaging in litigation over intellectual property assets diminishes their value as an incentive to invest in research. The frequency of court cases reflects firms’ strategies for appropriating innovation rents. We examine the characteristics of litigated patents and their owners by combining, for the first time, information about patent case filings from the U.S. district courts wit...
متن کاملOf Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-tech Patents
While each patent dispute is unique, most fit the profile of one of a limited number of patent litigation stories. A dispute between an independent inventor and a large company, for instance, is often cast in " David v. Goliath " terms. When two large companies fight over patents, in contrast, they are said to be playing the " sport of kings. " Some corporations engage in " defensive patenting ...
متن کامل